Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove fail-fast for Ginkgo #152

Merged

Conversation

dhaiducek
Copy link
Member

Parallel tests cause parallel processes to get interrupted on a failure, creating too much noise (and it's unnecessary now that the tests complete in a reasonable time).

The -p flag is also redundant since --procs is already specifying parallelism since its default is 1.

Parallel tests cause parallel processes to get interrupted, creating
too much noise (and it's unnecessary now that the tests complete in a
reasonable time).

Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <19750917+dhaiducek@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <19750917+dhaiducek@users.noreply.github.com>
- Use `ExpectWithOffset()` for deletion functions
- Add debug information to `GetWithTimeout()`

Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <19750917+dhaiducek@users.noreply.github.com>
@dhaiducek
Copy link
Member Author

There was one flake that showed up which I've added some additional logging for if it shows up again, but the fail fast flag removal was also working as expected, so this is ready for review.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 10, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhaiducek, JustinKuli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JustinKuli,dhaiducek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants